>
And then there were the major television networks: Netflix, Amazon, and Google. Wait a minute; what happened to ABC, CBS, and NBC? From where I sit, that is ancient history. The traditional networks are dead men walking, and just don’t know it. <
Wow. That's quite a leap. Usually I can't find too much to fault in your commentaries, Alfred, but you're way off base with this one, IMO. Why do I say that? Because
content is king. And your new, so called "big 3"
haven't got any. How much content do I watch each week from the "dead men walking"? About 30 hours. How much from your trio? Zero.
Why do you think the big whoop-de-do launch of Google TV fell flat on it's face? And the hardware products got withdrawn or flushed at fire-sale prices? No content. Sure, I can see that your trio is making the very first tentative steps in that direction (developing their own content). I'm sure that will continue, and even expand. But they've got a
long way to go. Much farther to go in fact, than the "dead men".
All the current networks need is to come up with new distribution mechanisms, while not crapping on their current broadcasters. I.e., by involving them and incorporating them into their distribution plans. I think that will be far more easily accomplished. (Just as an example, they have the bandwidth to establish streaming subcarriers themselves to encrypted monetized content, that already reaches millions of viewers.) And they have the content production in the bag already. Of course, they have inertia and a lot of old-school thinking working against them, but that can change. And at some point it will have to.
OTOH, maybe I'm just locked in an old mind-set, and you're right after all.