At CES 2012, Western Digital joined the ranks of manufacturers offering passive 3DTV technology, along with LG, Vizio, Panasonic, and Toshiba. The company announced that it plans to ship the 47″ W47S2TCD later this spring with a list price of $899, including four pairs of glasses. This means that this technology will now be available [...]
Read Column
HDTV Almanac - Another Passive 3DTV
-
alfredpoor
- Major Contributor
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:27 am
-
Rodolfo
- Author
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 8:46 pm
- Location: Lansdowne VA
Passive displacing active?
Regarding:
I rather would have written the above to reflect market facts as follows:
“A few new passive models have been announced at CES 2012. The 10% passive model market share as of Oct 2011 is relatively low compared to the active-shutter market but passive is still necessary as an “alternative”, should be announced that way, and hopefully grows for those that need it. The addition of a these new few models opens the choice and benefit those consumers that have problems with active shutter technology, or have issues of price and fragility of 3D glasses, although while still offering a per-eye inferior image resolution quality that should be educated. The real competition in image quality would be when the 4K technology of the recently shown passive 84” from LG is also applied to smaller passive panels to offer active-shutter’s full 1080p resolution per eye and lower visibility of the FPR lines.”
Facts:
90% of the 3DTV models in the market as of Oct 31, 2011 (according to 3D University of Insight Media’s data base) was made of active-shutter models, the other 10% was made of passive models from 3 companies (Vizio, LG, and Toshiba), a similar scenario applies to 3D projectors, with only one passive model from LG when all the other manufacturers are active-shutter.
From the point of “view to buy”, when a consumer actually tries to see a demo of the only passive 3DTV (LG) Best Buy and HHgreg sell (if available and if works) it is surrounded by active-shutter models from Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp, etc. Toshiba is not even on the floors, even when Toshiba is at Best Buy’s web site. Toshiba and Vizio passive 3DTVs may be bought/ordered from Costco, Sams’, etc along with the wine and food.
However, history tell us that, even when a technology is not properly shown, and its pros/cons are not fully disclosed in retail floors to properly educate consumers, can still attract consumers that look for cheap price tags without even looking at an image they would not know how to evaluate. This means we still have lots of work to do for them.
Best Regards,
Rodolfo La Maestra
End of active-shutter? Move to passive models? Rapid trend to passive?“I don’t see this as the end of active 3D models, but I clearly expect consumers to move to passive 3D models. They now have a choice across a range of brands, features, and prices, and they are going to favor the less expensive (and no-maintenance) passive glasses over the shutter-glasses models. I don’t expect active 3DTV technology to disappear overnight, but I do expect the market share to trend rapidly in the passive 3DTV direction.”
I rather would have written the above to reflect market facts as follows:
“A few new passive models have been announced at CES 2012. The 10% passive model market share as of Oct 2011 is relatively low compared to the active-shutter market but passive is still necessary as an “alternative”, should be announced that way, and hopefully grows for those that need it. The addition of a these new few models opens the choice and benefit those consumers that have problems with active shutter technology, or have issues of price and fragility of 3D glasses, although while still offering a per-eye inferior image resolution quality that should be educated. The real competition in image quality would be when the 4K technology of the recently shown passive 84” from LG is also applied to smaller passive panels to offer active-shutter’s full 1080p resolution per eye and lower visibility of the FPR lines.”
Facts:
90% of the 3DTV models in the market as of Oct 31, 2011 (according to 3D University of Insight Media’s data base) was made of active-shutter models, the other 10% was made of passive models from 3 companies (Vizio, LG, and Toshiba), a similar scenario applies to 3D projectors, with only one passive model from LG when all the other manufacturers are active-shutter.
From the point of “view to buy”, when a consumer actually tries to see a demo of the only passive 3DTV (LG) Best Buy and HHgreg sell (if available and if works) it is surrounded by active-shutter models from Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp, etc. Toshiba is not even on the floors, even when Toshiba is at Best Buy’s web site. Toshiba and Vizio passive 3DTVs may be bought/ordered from Costco, Sams’, etc along with the wine and food.
However, history tell us that, even when a technology is not properly shown, and its pros/cons are not fully disclosed in retail floors to properly educate consumers, can still attract consumers that look for cheap price tags without even looking at an image they would not know how to evaluate. This means we still have lots of work to do for them.
Best Regards,
Rodolfo La Maestra
-
alfredpoor
- Major Contributor
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:27 am
Re: HDTV Almanac - Another Passive 3DTV
Rodolfo, you make good points as always, but I'm confused how you managed to interpret my forecasts as "facts". I'm looking at exactly the same market numbers that you cite, and yet, in my opinion, this is how I see the market shaping up. (Keep in mind that there was a time when 90% of all the televisions on the market were black and white; somehow we all managed to end up with color sets.)
I appreciate that you interpret the current trends differently. As my late step-father loved to say, "it's a difference of opinions that makes horse races." I'm glad that we don't agree; it gives the readers more to think about.
Alfred
I appreciate that you interpret the current trends differently. As my late step-father loved to say, "it's a difference of opinions that makes horse races." I'm glad that we don't agree; it gives the readers more to think about.
Alfred