Surely manufactures have realized that very few people are going to want to put on glasses for all content. You should be able to opt out of 3D anytime. A 3D or nothing philosophy would most likely result in nothing in my opinion. We live complicated, multitasking lives and putting on glasses presupposes a dedicated, single-minded activity.
I'm an enthusiastic supporter of 3D TV, but I've yet to see a demo. Every time I go to a dealer, I'm told they have the TVs but the glasses are either all broken, missing or not arrived yet. Please tell me this is just a coincidence.
HDTV Almanac - DIY 2D->3D
-
hharris4earthlink
- Major Contributor

- Posts: 171
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:08 pm
- Location: Pasadena, California
-
alfredpoor
- Major Contributor

- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:27 am
Re: 3D, Not 3D and Maybe 3D
Actually, this is quite simple to do, as you can easily have "2D" glasses. If passive, use the same polarizer for both eyes. For shutter glasses, a simple switch could make both eyes see just the left image and the right image would be blocked for both eyes.hharris4earthlink wrote:Surely manufactures have realized that very few people are going to want to put on glasses for all content. You should be able to opt out of 3D anytime.
We're a long way from having to worry about too much 3D content, but so long as we're talking about stereoscopic images, 2D is always available by simply showing just one of the two images.
Alfred
-
Roger Halstead
- Major Contributor

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:13 pm
Regular content should be just that.
Regular content should be just that. IE, no glasses.
IF sets require glasses for all viewing I predict they will end up turning 3D TV into a fad with a limited market.
There is no reason that those sets can not be compatible with 2D as there are already sets out there that will receive and work with 3D that have been receiving 2D for some time.
IF sets require glasses for all viewing I predict they will end up turning 3D TV into a fad with a limited market.
There is no reason that those sets can not be compatible with 2D as there are already sets out there that will receive and work with 3D that have been receiving 2D for some time.
-
hharris4earthlink
- Major Contributor

- Posts: 171
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:08 pm
- Location: Pasadena, California
-
alfredpoor
- Major Contributor

- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:27 am
2D on 3D -- easy
All you have to do is turn off the 3D and it will just show one of the 2D stereoscopic images. I haven't done this with a 3D set -- haven't had one to play with -- but there's no reason why it shouldn't be a simple setting. I imagine that the manufacturers have this feature built in.
My point about the glasses is that it should also be easy to have a set show 3D and still let some people watch 2D if they prefer that.
Alfred
My point about the glasses is that it should also be easy to have a set show 3D and still let some people watch 2D if they prefer that.
Alfred